Letter: A remarried Prince and the church

Rev Peter M. Hawkins
Monday 21 July 1997 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A remarried Prince and the church

Sir: It is curious that Tony Wright, a modernising MP, should ridicule the Church of England's position on remarriage after divorce, and support the behaviour of dissolute monarchs in the past ("Marriage of Charles poses risk to church", 19 July). We became recently disenchanted with the misbehaviour of many Members of Parliament, because they were maintaining that their dubious personal and financial behaviour did not affect their ability to do their duties as MPs. And so Dr Wright now belongs to a government committed to decency in public life.

In my experience, adultery leading to divorce is always damaging, especially to the children. The Church in England, founded 1,400 years ago by St Augustine, has always tried to uphold Christ's teaching that remarriage after divorce during the lifetime of the spouse is adulterous. Reference to Henry VIII, who is not commemorated by the Church in England, is ludicrous.

If we are to abolish hereditary peers, and the hereditary heir to the throne cannot uphold the expectations the Church has of her members, it may be time to have a republic and disestablish the Church in England. It would be a great relief to most of us parish clergy not be to established, but the state would be the loser.

The Rev PETER M HAWKINS

Peterborough

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in