Letter: A recipe for eternal civil war in Bosnia

Professor P. J. D. Wiles
Wednesday 06 January 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: As the West prepares to do its duty, a gross error is surely still being committed. Lord Owen and Cyrus Vance wish to 'avoid a crude ethnic division of Bosnia- Herzegovina into three blocks', as the Bosnian Serbs have demanded, but to create a 'republic with about 10 autonomous regions under a loose central authority in Sarajevo'. But that means about 20 internal regional borders between the three nationalities, prolonging the mutual hatreds. So this is a recipe for eternal civil war, plus occasional 'foreign' invasions by Serbia and/or Croatia, which will each have about three 'oppressed minorities' to 'protect' - no longer one each] Anyhow, Alija Izetbegovic has, like the Serbs, rejected this scheme.

The present Serbian demand must, then, paradoxically, be accepted, but interpreted in a far more anti-Serbian way. Notably, we must 'cleanse' a very large area around Sarajevo so that the Slavic Muslims can move into it and defend their historic capital. Without this local armed superiority there will be no peace for this small nation, and no end at all to our inevitable peace-keeping expenses. For, of course, whatever is decided in Geneva, there must be a long-term, military guarantee, perhaps of that area alone.

Finally (and irresponsibly?), I suggest that religiously motivated outsiders such as Russia, Saudi Arabia and Iran be intimately consulted over any settlement.

Yours faithfully,

P. J. D. WILES

London School of Economics

London, WC1

4 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in