Letter: A place for stowaways

R. G. Milburn
Thursday 14 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr R. G. Milburn

Sir: I was shocked, but not surprised, by Raymond Whitaker's article "Life terms for the stowaway massacre" (11 December). During June and July this year, I travelled as a passenger on the container ship Contship Atlantic from Felixstowe to Karachi.

At that time the ship also had a stowaway, from a container, on board. He had travelled from Karachi to Bombay, Felixstowe, Hamburg, Antwerp and back to Karachi again. A journey of some 65 days' duration. Due to the integrity of the German officers he had been well treated, if confined.

I observed his treatment by a multiplicity of bureaucrats on the way. He was interviewed, photographed and even fingerprinted, but no one permitted him to land. The only practical care he received on shore was from the Felixstowe Seafarer's Centre, which clothed him. The crew were anticipating a passenger for life!

Political and economic migrants will not disappear just because we wish it. The only long-term solution is to make life more worthwhile for them at home.

Meanwhile, we need to develop a protection mechanism for our seafarers. Nine stowaways can be a real hazard on a ship that might only have two crew on duty at certain times of the day. Might I suggest that we develop an automatic right of landing stowaways at the vessel's next port of call, followed by repatriation to their port of embarkation at the expense of that government. At least the problem can then be returned to where it belongs - political debate - rather than providing continuing dangers to the lives of sailors and even to the lives of stowaways.

Yours faithfully,

R. G. Milburn

West Wickham, Kent

12 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in