Letter: A museum neither fake nor phoney, but a genuine part of Kent's rural heritage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read with interest, and some surprise, Nicholas Roe's article 'A nasty cottage industry' (3 May). I find it difficult to comprehend how he can accuse the Museum of Kent Life of 'tackiness', 'mindless leisure', 'theme park Britain', 'stylised landscape' and many other tired cliches without having actually visited it. If he had visited the museum, he would have seen that, in fact, we actually farm the land - hop garden, kitchen garden, herb garden, orchard, cobnut platt- as well as being involved in animal husbandry - goats, sheep, cattle, poultry, donkeys, horses. In our displays, we do not refrain from showing the grim conditions of rural communities in the past.
Certainly we hope that our visitors will have an enjoyable day out - but one that is also informative and which does not portray life in the countryside through rose-coloured spectacles.
While I have sympathy with much of what Mr Roe says about the decline in village life, there was the opportunity to write seriously about this subject. Unfortunately, he chose rather to purvey a hackneyed theory about the blurred distinction between fiction and reality, while throwing in some fanciful and unsubstantiated assertions of his own.
To make the Museum of Kent Life a party to the destruction of village life is to give us a significance way beyond what we merit. We are simply a museum interpreting rural life in Kent between the mid-19th and mid-20th centuries in an honest and decent way. We are neither fake nor phoney.
Yours faithfully,
NIGEL CHEW
General Manager
Museum of Kent Life Cobtree
Maidstone
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments