Letter: A loving smack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Duncan Carmichael
Sir: With reference to the recommendations made by the Commission on Children and Violence (report, 9 November), it is generally accepted that children (and adults) need boundaries in which to live, outside of which they know they will be punished.
There are different punishments suitable to different situations and a smack is often the appropriate deterrent. Removing it leaves parents more impotent in their attempt to give their children a framework in which to thrive.
The confusion comes in differentiating a smack from a blow. The one is borne out of love; the other, a violent act of emotional and physical abuse.
Of all the forms of abuse, emotional is the most difficult to prosecute against and the scars in the children are the hardest to display.To ban smacking may remove a symptom, but not the cause, of emotional abuse.
Yours faithfully,
Duncan Carmichael
Farnham, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments