Letter: A legacy ripe for reconsideration
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The 50th anniversary of the Beveridge report provides an occasion to challenge the Government's determination to assume his mantle.
The Department of Social Security has organised an exhibition to show how other countries have been able to benefit from Beveridge's vision. And the Secretary of State, Peter Lilley, has claimed that the United Kingdom 'provides one of the most comprehensive and secure safety nets in the (European) Community'. This may be so, although the replacement of single payments for one- off needs by the social fund and the abolition of benefit for 16- and 17-year-olds have made large holes in our safety net provision in the last few years.
But Beveridge's plan was based primarily on a non-means-tested network of benefits, with means- tested help very much a last resort. With one-third of the social security budget now being spent on means-tested benefits, compared with only 10 per cent in 1949, it is this emphasis that this and previous governments have so comprehensively reversed - with all the problems of low take-up, the poverty trap and social stigma that it brings.
Whatever his blind spots, Beveridge was always careful to stress the centrality of full employment to his plans for a fairer future. A social security system, however well structured, can not compensate adequately for problems whose origins lie elsewhere.
Recent figures on family poverty demonstrate that employment opportunities for women with children, as well as for many others now excluded from the labour market, are a precondition for the abolition of 'want'. And that means expanding affordable childcare provision, too.
The time is ripe for a reconsideration of Beveridge's legacy that retains his vision of solidarity and real social 'security' but applies it to today's changing patterns of employment and family life.
Yours sincerely,
FRAN BENNETT
Director
Child Poverty Action Group
London, EC1
30 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments