Letter: A. J. P. Taylor - still making history
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The critique of A. J. P Taylor by Gareth Stedman Jones uses arguments which are questionable on two grounds.
First, the implication that historians should have a good political agenda (in this case, to "assuage traditional English mistrust of all things German") is a dangerous one. Recent political pressure on British historians to foster the sense of national identity was not, I imagine, favoured by Dr Jones himself.
Second, the value of the concept "great historian" itself seems dubious, like that of "great people" generally.
Modern society cuts people down to size, and no longer expects or concedes heroic stature. If anything, it responds more readily to "troublemakers", and this of course was Taylor's preferred self-image.
Yours truly,
CHARLES TOWNSHEND
Department of History
University of Keele
Keele, Staffordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments