Letter: A fearful journey to the sheep market

Mr Peter Davies
Monday 20 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The RSPCA understands the imperative for Nicholas Soames, Parliamentary Secretary in the Ministry for Food and Agriculture (Profile, 11 December), to respond to public concerns over the long- distance live transport of animals, given that more than 100,000 letters have been received by the ministry this year.

However, rather than attacking our efforts to improve the lot of these unfortunate animals, the minister might be better advised to declare himself in favour of a maximum journey time for animals going for slaughter: this is supported by the Netherlands and Denmark, both leading meat producers. The RSPCA wants a maximum eight-hour journey time for such animals, in line with German foreign policy and with the votes of more than half of all MEPs: a massive 271 out of 279 supported our position in the European Parliament last Wednesday.

The RSPCA regrets that the UK has not argued for giving sheep, which form the vast majority of the nearly two million animals transported from the UK each year, anything other than a 24- hour feeding and watering interval time. Not only is this twice the 12- hour period which used to apply for sheep in the UK, but this policy offers only an impractical solution. British sheep are the best quality in the world. But sheep need to be rested for 48 hours after transport if they are to maintain their condition. Dehydration, hunger, stress and bruising affect live sheep, but not carcasses. The fact is that live sheep deteriorate in quality during transport.

There is a potential conjunction here of animal welfare interests and of the effective marketing of an important British product. It is not farmers but the meat trade which is taking short-term gains on the live export market, for example, by helping cause the closure of a number of regional abattoirs. The result could be to put at risk our aim of being the prime lamb supplier to Europe as well as to question our oft-quoted claim of being the most animal welfare- conscious country in Europe.

Yours faithfully,

PETER DAVIES

Director General

RSPCA

Horsham, West Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in