Letter: A doctor's duty and a patient's right to die
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The case of Dr Nigel Cox will inevitably increase the demands to legalise voluntary euthanasia. As you rightly point out (leading article, 21 September), the case against such a move is a powerful one. Nevertheless, doctors have a duty not only to protect patients' natural right to live but also their natural right to die.
Where the outlook is hopeless, high technology and life-prolonging treatment are inappropriate. Care has then to be directed to the relief of pain and distress and the support not only of the patient but also of those close to him or her. However, such care often requires the advice and help of those who are experts in palliative medicine. Was such care and expertise available to Mrs Boyes and her family?
It is a simple fact that pain control and palliative medicine services are a low priority for many health authorities. Pain clinics are under threat of closure in some parts of the country. Hospices are to a very large extent funded from voluntary sources. Thus the number and type of patients they can care for are limited.
The issue is not whether voluntary euthanasia should be legalised, but whether there are adequate services for the proper care of the terminally ill within or in conjunction with the NHS. The evidence is that there are not.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN SEARLE
Consultant Anaesthetist and Chairman
The Exeter and District Hospice
Exeter
21 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments