Letter: A dam good thing

Kerim Uras
Sunday 19 December 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE ILISU DAM in Turkey will perhaps lead to the loss of some land but it is not possible to build a dam without losing some land ("Blair plans to drown Kurd town", 12 December). This is quite different from "flooding tens of thousands of people"! Perhaps you think it would be better not to build that dam and not to develop the regional economy at all.

Everyone in that region will benefit from infrastructure investment, in the form of a boom in agricultural output and energy. Even neighbouring countries will get a more regular flow of water, preventing drought in the summer and floods in the winter months. It is daft to claim that building a dam would lead to war. Even though there may be some interruptions during the filling phase, after filling the reservoir Iraq will get the same water as usual.

Opposing investment in Eastern Turkey is tantamount to defending an archaic economic and social structure. We Turks feel we have an obligation to bring that backward part of our country into the 21st century. Environmental and archaeological concerns should of course be met. But that requires working hand in hand, not opposing the whole scheme.

KERIM URAS

London SW15

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in