Letter: A Bill to protect UK human rights
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The discussion in recent weeks on the state of British justice, the inadequacy of our political institutions, and even the standing of Britain as a democracy, underlines the need for a new constitutional settlement in which the rights of the individual must be made clear. This week, in which Amnesty International is launching a major new human rights campaign, I will be presenting a Bill for the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.
This is a policy position overwhelmingly endorsed by the Labour Party conference in Brighton and backed by the Labour leader, John Smith. It is gathering the support of many people regardless of party allegiance.
Incorporation would have one major advantage. It would expedite the processes of justice for those British citizens seeking redress for past or existing human rights violations. At present, a judgment from the European Court in Strasbourg can take upwards of five years. The recent decision to streamline the working of the European Court - while welcome - will not solve this problem of protracted adjudication, given the current backlog of cases (amounting to some 2,500 applications), and the expectation of increased demands from Eastern and Central Europe following enlargement of the Council of Europe.
Under existing arrangements the time delay and expense of the Strasbourg process is a powerful deterrent to those seeking justice. Without external support from concerned individuals or pressure groups, only those with the backing of substantial private resources can make use of the facility of individual petition. This amounts to a two-tier system of rights in this country.
Incorporation would make available a simple domestic remedy in British courts - accessible to all whose human rights have been infringed. To that extent it would be an important, if modest, first step towards the modernisation of the British system of justice.
Yours sincerely,
GRAHAM ALLEN
MP for Nottingham North (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
18 October
The writer is shadow minister for democracy and the constitution.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments