Letter: A benefit for the employer, but not for the jobless

Mr David Chandler
Thursday 14 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Matthew Symonds is a strong advocate of Dennis Snower's Benefit Transfer Programme. The idea, as he conveys it, is essentially that the long-term unemployed should be permitted to use their welfare benefit, in varying degrees, as a subsidy to induce otherwise reluctant employers to take them on.

In the context of the common ground seemingly reached by all sides in the political spectrum, Mr Symonds believes that the first party to pick up Professor Snower's idea and run with it will win the high ground in the unemployment debate. Crucial to Mr Symonds' support is that the scheme will not cost the taxpayer any more than is already spent in benefit support on the unemployed. However, he fails to address the very real possibility that employers might sack their unsubsidised employees in favour of those with subsidies as a highly efficient means of cutting their labour costs.

It may be that Professor Snower has already thought of a safeguard against this, but without one the scheme stands to expand the social security budget that much further, while potentially leaving the total number of jobs within the economy unchanged.

Yours sincerely,

DAVID CHANDLER

London, W14

13 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in