Leading Article: When sport is let down by athletes

Thursday 25 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AT THE Olympics or the European Championships, Britain is one among many nations. But during the Commonwealth Games, the 'mother country' assumes a pre-eminence unmatched in other sporting fixtures. So the announcement yesterday that five British athletes have failed drug tests, albeit prior to the games, is all the more shameful.

The positive test for Diane Modahl, the 800 metres runner, is particularly shocking. No British woman in international competition has previously tested positive. If a second sample confirms the findings of the first, Britain's women will almost certainly be disqualified from the World Cup at Crystal Palace next month.

This is a sporting crisis for Britain. It should provoke the same soul-searching that the Canadians experienced during the Ben Johnson scandal at the Seoul Olympics in 1988. Too often, sporting bodies are equivocal about stamping out abuses, for fear that drastic action may weaken the country in international competition.

The temptations to take drugs are strong. Which athlete does not yearn for the celebrity and millionaire status that success has brought figures such as Linford Christie? Ms Modahl came fourth in the World Championships in Stuttgart last year. Like dozens of others on the edge of world fame, she faced the choice of taking drugs that might bring great wealth - or abiding by the regulations. Even Ms Modahl, who has strong religious convictions, could find those pressures irresistible.

'Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play,' George Orwell claimed. 'It is bound up with hatred, jealousy, boastfulness, disregard of all rules.' He exaggerated. Even so, the authorities face a daunting task cleaning up the activities of both professionals and top amateurs. The sophistication of modern pharmacology adds to the difficulties: new drugs are always a step ahead of tests. But the Sports Council must act to ensure that the best possible example is set.

Random testing should increase: already a British athlete cannot refuse an official who turns up on the doorstep clutching a bottle. Repeat offenders should be banned for life and lose their titles. Top athletes could be tested weekly during preparation for events. It would then become as difficult as it should be to reach for stardom on pills.

Every sport relies on respect for the rules. If that is lost, the sport is gradually destroyed. Britain's athletics authorities cannot afford to take anything but the strongest action in response to this week's news.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in