Leading Article: Soft drugs and hard jails
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LORD WOOLF'S speech last night on prisons and crime contained two important points. He called for a debate on whether a controlled legalisation of drugs might help to sever the link between addiction and crime; and he attacked as 'irresponsible and short-sighted' the idea that the best answer to rising crime is to put more people in prison and make their lives tougher.
There are good reasons for thinking that drugs should be made legal, and many of them have been canvassed in the Independent. The campaign for a debate on drug legalisation has greater weight now that one of the most respected and humane figures of the legal establishment is one of its public advocates.
The second point is more subtle. It could be argued that Lord Woolf was not levelling a specific accusation when he said the context set by Government and Parliament for prisons and sentencing policy was 'in the process of change'; and that he had nobody particularly in mind when he decried the 'fashion, not confined to the totally uninformed, to indulge in rhetoric, advocating increased sentences across the board'.
But the law lord's speech was made less than a week after Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, laid before the Tory party conference a multitude of new measures intended to tilt the balance in favour of the victims of crimes and against their perpetrators. In that speech, Mr Howard said nothing about the job of helping criminals to get back into society, and little about the risk that prison overcrowding will make them continue their life of crime with more professionalism rather than abandon it.
Lord Woolf did not propose that the Government should set formal quotas on the number of people that the courts may send to prison. But he called for more prevention and more community service, and a curb on the increase in the prison population.
He recalled the words of his report two years ago: 'The prison service has to live with prisoners during their time in prison. The rest of the country lives with them afterwards.' He is right. Mr Howard may be unable to resist the temptation to play to the galleries; but if he truly wants ordinary citizens to sleep safer in their beds, he must make British jails more humane, not less.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments