LEADING ARTICLE: On your bike, Duchess

Thursday 18 January 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Yesterday the chief executive of Britain's most prestigious outfit got tough. She let it be known that the company was not prepared to bail out one of its most wayward loss-making subsidiaries. The word was that it was time for this particular offshoot to stand on its own two feet and to take responsibility for itself.

In taking this line Her Majesty the Queen was exerting the leadership that the beleaguered monarchy requires from her. Delayering and downsizing is finally coming to the Royal Family, having swept through most other British corporations of note.

It started in 1993 when the Queen finally accepted the political importance of paying tax and did some long overdue thinning out of the civil list to remove extraneous hangers-on. Late last year she finally bit the bullet and stepped into her son's disastrous marriage by trying to procure a long-overdue divorce between the Prince and Princess of Wales. Now she has let the Duchess of York know that she is on her own with her debts.

Quite right, but rather late. It will seem incredible to most people that a woman in her mid-thirties can squander a huge separation settlement, substantial book royalties and a generous allowance for her children, and then go more than a million quid into the red.

It is some kind of testimony to the company that the Duchess of York keeps that she could be financially stretched and yet jet off for the kind of holidays and shopping trips that 99 per cent of her mother-in- law's subjects can barely imagine. There is a lack of realism and responsibility there that boggles the mind.

But Her Majesty must also ask herself how all this has come about. How did Sarah Ferguson come to expect the lifestyle of an international jetsetter, feeling little obligation to restrain her most extravagant impulses, while rendering precious little public service?

Presumably she did it because that is still the way that a substantial part of Britain's Royal Family and its entourage lives. With their huge his-and-hers country estates, several holidays a year in Klosters or Mustique, state-of-the-art Range Rovers, education at Eton, polo-playing (is there nowhere a prince who likes soccer?) and helicopter-flying, the royals have not been part of Britain but apart from it, yet without gaining any gravitas or authority.

The time has come - and almost everybody sees it - for a more democratic monarchy. To survive, the monarchy must reflect back to us the virtues that we most respect - not the lifestyle that we most envy. Otherwise, the company may one day go bust, something the chief executive seems to have realised.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in