Leading Article: Let the consumer lead the way on battery eggs

Sunday 12 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TWO distinct questions have become intertwined in the debate over battery eggs. One is practical: will hens that are allowed to roam freely produce tastier and healthier eggs than those fed on chemicals and imprisoned in wire cages? The other is moral: can it be right, whatever the practical advantages of battery farming, to subject hens to such apparently cruel conditions?

The report in today's Veterinary Record provides a resounding answer to the second question. Their investigations showed that hens in battery farms show clear symptoms of suffering - leading 'beyond reasonable doubt' to the conclusion that keeping hens in cages is 'extremely distressing (to them) in many different ways'. No one who reads the report will be able to eat a battery egg with a clear conscience.

But establishing that battery farming is cruel does not necessarily provide a convincing argument for making it a criminal offence. Society allows many animals to be maltreated, from young cows kept in the dark so their flesh stays white to goldfish sold at fairgrounds in undersized and overheated plastic bags. Moreover, successive restrictions are always vulnerable to the objection that nothing short of banning leather gloves and making veganism compulsory is morally consistent.

A wiser solution is to entrust the job of discouraging battery farming to British consumers themselves. At the moment, the rules on egg labelling are so confusing as to be useless. A recent survey discovered that very few consumers understand the difference between 'free-range' and 'perching-barn' eggs (which are produced under more humane conditions) and 'country-fresh', a label that can be applied to any type of egg.

Rather than attempting a new form of words to describe humane egg production, and spending large sums to explain the new labelling to consumers, the Government could choose a simpler alternative. It should require producers to label battery eggs as such, with the word 'battery' printed as large as the word 'eggs' - even when the eggs are merely an ingredient in prepared foods. Hopefully, consumers will increasingly opt for less cruel methods of egg production, and it will be the profit motive rather than the threat of prosecution that leads farmers to be kinder to their animals.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in