Leading Article: How the sexes can reach equilibrium

Tuesday 21 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT IS commonly assumed that women's attitudes have changed dramatically in recent years, and that problems between the sexes reflect a failure of men to modernise themselves. As evidence, the image is evoked of the working woman who successfully combines career with home duties. In contrast, men are portrayed as barely domesticated and out-of-date, stuck in old patterns of full-time work and idle leisure. In this picture of society, men play the role of guilty parties, anachronistic in their attitudes, inflexible in their ways. Life would be fine if only men could be more like women.

A survey published today by Mintel seems only to confirm the case against men. The price of paid employment for women has, it appears, been drudgery rather than glamour as they find themselves saddled not only with a job but also with almost all the domestic chores. Meanwhile, men do little housework and enjoy more of the leisure.

But reality is surely different. Men are not acting as shamefully as appears to be the case and women have not changed as much as they might like to think. It may be that both sexes have to change considerably if they are to be happy in the modern world.

Traditionally, women gave their all as wives and mothers. The nature of family life did not lend itself to a distinction between work and leisure. As women have participated in the workplace, they have continued to give their all to a combination of job and home. Yet they need time for recreation: women who combine work with raising families may say they are fulfilled, but they also, understandably, complain of exhaustion.

Men are far more culturally attuned to the distinction between work and leisure, and to home as a place of rest rather than work. They are also more concerned to appease the demands of employers, since male self-esteem is so tied to careers. As a result, men in full-time jobs are working longer and longer hours, while also wisely taking time for leisure.

Seen in this light, the difficulties created when both spouses work are not solely attributable to men. They are more linked to the endurance of traditional attitudes that both women and men retain in a changed world. The answer seems to lie in part-time work for both sexes, with women as well as men understanding that home is for both work and leisure. As yet, only the most fortunate couples have reached this happy state of equilibrium.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in