Leading Article: Foreign players and the 'ooh ahh' factor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT SEEMS unarguable that the presence of gifted, well-known overseas players in this country's cricket and football teams benefits all concerned. First, they help to raise attendance at matches; second, playing with or against them can only raise the game of home- reared players. Yet in the governing circles of both sports, voices have been raised calling for restrictions on imported players - even, in cricket's case, a possible ban.
Yesterday, the Test and County Cricket Board declared a moratorium on new contracts extending beyond 1996, pending a decision at its winter meeting in December. To impose any form of ban on that occasion would be both dictatorial and foolish. It is not as if England's native cricketers are in danger of being kept out of the county game by a host of foreigners: only one per team is allowed, making 18 in all.
Yesterday's move was in response to complaints by Lancashire prompted by the departure for home of its star Pakistani bowler, Wasim Akram, to attend a training camp before Pakistan's tour of Sri Lanka. Irritating though such obligations may be - even if surely foreseeable - they give counties a chance to try those talented domestic players allegedly being kept out by foreigners.
In football the argument is more complicated. No one denies the stimulus given to the British game by star imports in the class of
the Argentine Osvaldo Ardiles, France's Eric Cantona and now Germany's Jurgen Klinsmann.
The question raised by Gordon Taylor, chairman of the Professional Footballers' Association, is whether it is fair to British players for clubs to buy down-the-line foreigners because they are cheaper rather than better. There are now about 115 foreign players in League football. The irresistible conclusion is that British players are over- priced. It is up to clubs to bring more sense to the market place.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments