Leading Article: Enforced reforms for civil servants

Monday 08 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SMALL earthquake in the Civil Service; none killed. Last week's strike by civil servants was little noticed by the public and virtually ignored by the Government. It deserved more attention, whether or not further action follows. As William Waldegrave announced in the Commons on Thursday, the Government intends to press on with its programme of 'market-testing' under which a widening range of Civil Service work is put out for competitive tender. He is undeterred by the fact that savings of only about pounds 100m have been achieved, as against a target of pounds 375m.

The argument over the programme is part pragmatic, part philosophical. How can taxpayers get better services without paying higher taxes? Where are the proper limits of the state's responsibilities? And what of the ethos of public service?

In the United States, the fashionable book on the subject is Reinventing Government by David Osborne and Ted Gaebler. Much read here, too, it describes how the public sector can be transformed by an infusion of entrepreneurial spirit that switches management from commands to incentives, from 'rowing to steering'.

The central idea is obviously applicable to Britain and is already showing promising results. But it may be misunderstood and misapplied by a British government that has swung too far towards a minimalist view of government. The American book does not call for massive privatisation but for revitalising the public sector by importing modern management methods from the private sector. Contracting out some public services is part of this process, but not its be all and end all. The process also relies heavily on stimulating initiative in local government, which does not seem to be on John Major's agenda.

Warning voices are being raised in Britain. Professor Peter Hennessy argues that the private sector should not take over services such as prisons and taxation, where coercion is required. Those should be performed by servants of the Crown under public control. Douglas Hurd appealed eloquently to the Conservative Party conference to 'show that we are not driven by ideology to question every function of the state'.

Mr Waldegrave is trying to move too far too fast. He is likely to produce spectacular results in some areas and disasters in others. If civil servants can avoid appearing merely as defenders of entrenched interests and try instead to be constructive about necessary reform, they might attract more attention - even sympathy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in