Leading Article: Britain's future should be seen and heard

Sunday 10 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE VALUE of the 'Choices for Britain' project described on page two is not primarily as an opinion poll on the attitudes of young people. It is certainly useful to know that most of those asked think that Britain is becoming a worse place to live in, that social problems are now the greatest threat to the country, that we should give domestic problems priority and that we should work with Europeans rather than 'do what we want'. But these answers, although they may well be representative, come from fewer than 3,000 people aged 14 to 18 in Avon only.

More interesting is what the exercise tells us about political education. The aim of the experiment was to teach the participants about decision-making by confronting them with a set of options, each with advantages and disadvantages, risks, trade-offs and costs - as in the real world. What struck the teachers and organisers was the enthusiasm with which the pupils responded after being asked to imagine themselves as Government advisers and then to examine options and make their own proposals. Many felt they had not been listened to in this way before. Nor had problems been so clearly and objectively explained.

In theory this ought not to be so. The media are full of experts explaining every problem under the sun and politicians putting at least three viewpoints, while pollsters listen constantly to what the public says it wants. If schoolchildren feel left out it is partly because they are below voting age and are often more interested in other things. But, while it would be wrong to extrapolate too far, their age group is not the only one that finds expert debate too often above its head and political debate too much concerned with posturing, point-scoring, and the making of unreal promises.

The lesson of the experiment is that children have reserves of political interest and engagement that could be better developed to prepare them for citizenship. As the best teachers know already, they respond when taken seriously and listened to. If they are to become informed voters they need especially to learn the methodology and real difficulties of mature decision- making: how to weigh up options, understand trade-offs and appreciate the compromises that have to made in an imperfect world. The Avon experiment has shown the way. It deserves wider application.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in