Labour’s refusal to back an open door policy for Ukrainian refugees is shameful
Refugees Welcome: We might expect this sort of mealy-mouthed obfuscation from the Tories – but Labour can and should do better
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
It’s bad news for Labour when there are Tories taking a more compassionate position on the burgeoning refugee crisis caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It is a particularly shameful moment for the party.
On Monday’s BBC Newsnight, senior Tory MP Jeremy Hunt was asked whether he supported an “open door” policy for Ukrainian refugees, which would mirror the one adopted by the EU. He said: “Yes, and I expect we will get something like that in the next couple of days from the prime minister.”
On the same programme, Labour’s shadow minister for international development, Preet Kaur Gill, was asked the same question. She responded, “Well, look, we need a very simplified process”, and went on to talk about shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper pressing and correcting her equivalent, Priti Patel, in the Commons.
When asked again, Gill said: “What we’re saying is we need a simplified scheme. We’ve already got the Hong Kong one, it’s working really well. We need to have something very similar to that.”
A “simplified process”, when terrified families are forced to flee a deadly, catastrophic invasion? It’s just not good enough.
We might expect this sort of mealy-mouthed obfuscation from the Tories – the party of Kevin Foster, who reckoned (in a now-deleted tweet) that Ukrainian refugees should apply for seasonal work visas, presumably so they can pick fruit in the UK, and the callous Nationality and Borders Bill that sought to criminalise Ukrainians making their own way to the UK in search of safety, flouting the Refugee Convention that Britain helped draw up.
But Labour can and should do better.
Let’s face it, the party under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership wouldn’t be making wishy-washy statements about “simplified processes”. Responding to the plight of people fleeing conflict and brutality with openness, compassion and humanity would have been the priority. There can be no doubt about this, even in the minds of the most vociferous Corbyn critics.
Keir Starmer has made much of the fact that the party is now under “new management”, even using the crisis in Ukraine as an opportunity to punish and threaten left-wing MPs. He might be concerned about winning back the so-called Red Wall voters lost to Brexit, but his approach has created an empty, value-less Labour Party – a void where principle should be, wrapped in the Union Jack. Labour is apparently “the party of Nato” again, but its other core values are now anyone’s guess.
Advised by Peter Mandelson, Starmer has taken increasing cues from the New Labour approach, after being elected leader on a socialist platform and promising to continue the work of his predecessor. He played one record, won the leadership and seamlessly began to play an entirely different one.
In one way, it’s unsurprising that Starmer’s Labour hasn’t thrown its weight behind the most compassionate and humanitarian position – that’s just not what Labour’s about under this new management. Instead of shouting “refugees welcome!” from the rooftops, Labour mumbles “some refugees welcome under a simplified scheme”.
To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment, sign up to our free weekly Voices Dispatches newsletter by clicking here
Currently, the government is offering sanctuary to Ukrainian refugees with family members already in the UK. They have widened the criteria to include non-immediate family members such as grandparents, adult children, siblings and elderly parents. In a separate scheme, UK citizens and companies will be able to sponsor Ukrainian refugees who want to live here, even if none of their family members already do so. It’s unclear what this will look like or when it will be introduced.
The government’s plan compares very unfavourably to the position of the EU, which is offering to accept all Ukrainian refugees, with or without visas, for up to three years.
Whatever Patel told MPs in the Commons, this is not a “very generous” or “expansive” or “unprecedented” package. It’s not enough. We know it’s not enough – we can see the pictures and videos on social media of people bloodied and terrified, mothers sleeping on the floor of refugee shelters, clutching small children. It’s heart-wrenching, terrifying, painful – the only response can be of generosity, empathy, support and “what can we do to help?”
If Labour can’t bring itself to be the opposition party that truly stands with Ukraine by welcoming its people in their hour of need, whether they have visas or not, then it’s not an alternative to the Tories. It’s pointless – an empty shell.
The Independent has set up a petition calling on the UK government to be at the forefront of the international community offering aid and support to those in Ukraine. To sign the petition click here
The Independent is also raising money for the people of Ukraine – if you would like to donate then please click here for our GoFundMe page
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments