It might not be nice and it might not be fair but for the good of the country, Joe Biden has to go
Trump is trying to take corruption off the table as a voting issue. And the Biden issue lets him blur the narrative enough to do so
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Democrats must defeat Trump. This is not just a political objective; it is an existential necessity. Four more years of Trump is almost beyond comprehension. Everything must yield to that imperative. And so Joe Biden must go. No, it is not fair — it is just necessary.
The justification for Joe Biden’s candidacy was that he could beat Trump. He could win in the Rust Belt. He is a safe pair of hands, a return to normalcy after the exhausting chaos of every day with President Trump. For that objective, we could put aside the Anita Hill hearings, the Iraq War vote, the dog-whistles on busing, the profile in something less than courage. He could turn out African American voters, more even than African American candidates. And he could bring working class whites, the Reagan Democrats who put Trump in the White House, back to the Democratic column, meaning that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, maybe even Ohio might return to the fold.
That justification has gone. Candidate Biden is a hologram, an outdated image of the Joe Biden of more than a decade ago, who was then Barack Obama’s wise adviser and helpmeet. He has visibly aged. He is no longer just the affable, somewhat goofy Biden, but instead, he is a shaky, uncertain, forgetful messenger.
Were the vagaries of age the only issue, perhaps the Democrats could soldier on with old Uncle Joe. But now we have the irony of an accusation of corruption and criminality by the master of projection Donald Trump. Why should the Democrats quail at Trump’s deliberate and baseless attempt to slime the candidate that he views as his most problematic opponent?
There is nothing criminal about Hunter Biden taking a job in Ukraine for which he appears to have had no qualifications. And $50,000 per month, although a great deal of money, is chump change to the Trump children and in-laws, who appear to be manifestly unqualified for most jobs, especially senior advisors to the President. Nor was Biden’s 2013 opening of a hedge fund whose largest investor was the Chinese-government owned Bank of China against any law or regulation.
Nevertheless, Hunter Biden’s career as a Ukrainian gas executive or Chinese-backed private equity mogul is the same old story of powerful politicians’ family members cashing in on their derivative fame. Some of us are old enough to remember a long cast of ne’er-do-well relatives, from Donald Nixon to Billy Carter to Roger Clinton to Neal Bush.
Even if, as Joe Biden maintains, he never had any discussion with his son about his business ventures, there can be no doubt that Hunter Biden never would have gotten the Ukrainian job or the Chinese sovereign investment if his father had not been Vice President of the United States.
Joe Biden knew at the time there was a good chance he would run for president. Maybe he had no control over what his adult son was doing. Maybe he thought it wouldn’t matter or that nobody would ever cast doubt on his integrity. Maybe he was happy that his unruly son had settled into a responsible adult role. In any event, he knew or should have known that this would be a major issue in the future and for whatever reason, he failed to prevent it. Now he is outraged but unwilling to say that it should never have happened. It was low-level business as usual in the political swamp.
But if there was no crime and no evidence of personal corruption, why should that cause Joe Biden to stand down? Because Donald Trump is, by any measure, the most corrupt president in the history of the United States. The evidence is clear beyond argument that he would do anything for money or power and already has, from shilling for his hotels to digging for dirt against opponents from foreign governments.
Trump promised to drain the swamp, but he has flooded it to the point that the muck threatens to engulf us all. Being called corrupt by Trump is like being called ugly by a frog. But Trump is not trying to convince anyone that he is honest. He is trying to convince voters that everyone is corrupt: it’s all the same, my kids, Biden’s kids, it doesn’t matter. No one is pure and any attempt to make fine distinctions plays right into his strategy. He is trying to take corruption off the table as a voting issue. And the Biden issue lets him blur the narrative enough to do so.
Is this fair to Joe Biden, perennially the poorest guy in the Senate and a Vice President in one of the most corruption-free administrations in history? Of course not. But in 2020, corruption has to matter. It is a core issue that is threatening the future of our Constitutional structure.
There are plenty of other candidates, each with her strengths and weaknesses. Democrats must select one for whom there is no sniff of the ordure of graft and grift that surrounds the Trump administration. We can take no chances or rely on fine distinctions. Joe has to go.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments