As sick as I am of this jam-making Labour leader and his Momentum advocates, keeping Brexit off Corbyn's conference agenda was a wise move

Apart from a tiny handful of issues that are important matters of principle in their own right, there’s no reason for Labour to assume ownership of any of this mess

Paul Renteurs
Monday 25 September 2017 18:00 BST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It’s been just over a year since I gave my own, rather barbed review of the Government’s Brexit brainstorming session at Chequers. Over a year (and a botched general election) later, I couldn’t be happier that Labour have apparently decided not to mention the B word at its Brighton love-in this week.

Since 23 June last year, I’ve met an inordinate amount of people on both sides of the so-called debate on our future relationship with Europe who say, often in an attempt at Remainer consolation, or to bring the turgid discussion to a swift close, “Well, it’s certainly an interesting time in politics.”

Am I the only one who finds every discussion on this topic tedious almost to the point of profundity? Does anybody really know, or care, what a soft Brexit is? Does anybody give a fiddler’s fart whether the transition period (whatever the hell that is) is two years, or four years long?

As for the soap opera of Cabinet infighting (a term I can only conclude was spread by the Tories themselves in a desperate bid to add a veneer of excitement to the proceedings), it’s enough to give even the quaintest storyline from The Archers a distinct frisson of drama.

On top of all of this, is anybody prepared to say that their life would be enriched by hearing what the scargillian, jam-making, treasurer-of-the-allotment-committee leader of the Labour Party thinks about all of this?

Jeremy Corbyn refuses to commit to post-Brexit single market

In fairness to said leader of the Labour Party, taking Brexit off the agenda may well stand as one of the more politically savvy moves he – or rather, his sponsors at Momentum (who put forward a number of topics to be debated, all of which were adopted, and none of which included a whiff of the European question) – have made.

While the Foreign Secretary, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Home Secretary battle it out to become King or Queen of the slag heap that the Conservative Party will have been reduced to by the time they’ve finished, the Labour Party seems more united in the warm afterglow of the unexpectedly successful election than they have been since Jezza became leader in 2015.

Why jeopardise that for the sake of debating something that is far less interesting, and, let’s face it, less important, to many voters than stagnating wages, declining police numbers, poverty, the visceral cutting of local government funding, Islamic terrorism, the rise in hate crime, and the burgeoning funding NHS crisis (to name but a few)?

This titanic mess is, after all, not one of Labour’s making. Jeremy Corbyn didn’t call a snap election that left the Government castrated going into the negotiations. Nor did he, or any of his predecessors, call a referendum earlier than anybody expected in order to overcome weaknesses spawned by the dismal failure of the Conservative Party to secure a strong majority in 2015.

Jeremy Corbyn on Andrew Marr: 'There will be a lot of movement- of workers after Brexit'

We are all of us footing the bill for the failures of successive Tory leaders when it comes to the European debate. Apart from a tiny handful of issues that are important matters of principle in their own right – such as that those who have built lives here whilst they were free to do so should be allowed to remain – there’s no reason for Labour to assume ownership of any of this.

So instead of the self-immolation that some in the Labour Party seem intent on when they criticise the decision not to debate Brexit this week, why not enjoy the fact that in one stroke the party has made itself more interesting, more relevant and less divided. I say this not as a Corbynista (I most certainly am not that) but as someone who has far more urgent and interesting things to do than talk about Brexit, such as re-arranging my underwear drawer, trolling Jacob Rees-Mogg on Twitter and throwing darts at that photo of Nigel Farage I have sellotaped to my office door.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in