Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Where self-restraint doesn't work, perhaps a legally-binding contract will. At least that's what 14-year-old Rachel Baier thought when she asked her father, Paul, to draw up a legal form requiring her to go from February 4 to June 26 without logging on to Facebook.
There's a sweetener, too. If Rachel makes it April, $50 hits her bank account. All the way to June and another $150 follows.
The motivation behind this legal handcuffing is, apparently, all on the part of the daughter, who became tired of wasting time on the social networking site.
But Mr Baier isn't the only parent introducing legal stipulations to curb a teenager's digital life. Last month Lisa Markwell wondered at the mother who gave her 13-year-old son an iPhone for Christmas, with an 18 point contract attached (including: "No porn. Search the web for information you would openly share with me. If you have a question about anything, ask a person – preferably me or your father.")
Are contracts a parenting technique you'd give a try?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments