The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Poll: With Zero Dark Thirty, is Hollywood guilty of promoting torture?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Iran has shocked the world this afternoon by unveiling photographs of a mechanical amputation device used to chop the fingers off convicted thieves and adulterers. But are the practices of the democratic West much better?
Oscar contender Zero Dark Thirty has courted controversy by appearing to condone torture, where it leads to a favourable outcome - an end-justifies-the-means attitude that contravenes international human rights legislation. And Kathryn Bigelow's film is not alone: The dubious practices of CIA agents have drawn awards notice in Hollywood product ranging from TV series Homeland to Ben Affleck's Argo.
Where general opinion goes, legislation must eventually follow - so is Hollywood playing a role in normalising - even glamorising - torture?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments