Poll: Is the use of anti-homeless spikes justified?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There was an outcry across social media this weekend after photos of sharp anti-homeless studs outside a block of London flats went viral.
Many were shocked, although others have pointed out that similar measures to prevent rough sleeping have been in place for years, such as sloping seats at bus stops and narrow park benches.
Some say that such methods keep homeless people off the streets, and encourage them to seek help from outreach programs and shelters.
It's also likely that finding someone sleeping on your doorstep would give you a fright, regardless of whether the person was homeless or not.
Although it's still an unpleasant thing to see, and for many symbolises the inhumane way we treat our society's most vulnerable individuals.
So is the use of such sharp studs justified? Let us know by taking our poll below:
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments