Poll: Is Cameron right to reject call to lower age of consent to 15?

 

Sunday 17 November 2013 14:26 GMT
Comments
Professor John Ashton, president of the Faculty of Public Health, said the current legal limit prevented sexually active younger teenagers from getting support with issues of disease and contraception.
Professor John Ashton, president of the Faculty of Public Health, said the current legal limit prevented sexually active younger teenagers from getting support with issues of disease and contraception. (GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Parents of teenagers, best look away now. A leading public health expert has called on the Government to lower the age of consent to 15, suggesting that the current age limit is preventing sexually active teenagers from seeking help with issues of disease or contraception.

Professor John Ashton said society should accept that a third of 14 to 15-year-olds were having sex.

To respond "helpfully" to this generation and "support them on this journey into adult life", Ashton argues the age limit for legal sexual intercourse should be dropped from 16 to 15.

But Downing Street said there were no plans to do, and that the current age of 16 was in place to protect children.

Where do you stand? Should we accept that teenagers are having sex at a younger age, and therefore legitimise such behaviour and encourage openness, or stand by the current system as a bulwark against teens having sex before they may be ready to do so? Take our poll

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in