Poll: A sugary drinks tax could raise the Government £275m. Should we introduce one?

 

Friday 01 November 2013 11:44 GMT
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

14 teaspoons of sugar make the medicine go down. Or rather, 14 teaspoons of sugar is roughly what a 500ml bottle of fizzy drink contains, and it’s rotting the teeth of the nation, and turning us all obese. This is what a team of Reading and Oxford University researchers have found, in the most detailed study yet on sugary drinks and their effect on health.

In a study that will be ignored by a sizeable chunk of the population this lunchtime, the doctors calculated that adding a 20 per cent sin tax on fizzy drinks – about 12p more – would lead to a drop-off in purchases, which would itself stop between 110,000 and 250,000 people becoming obese. Plus, the tax itself could raise the Treasury £275m.

One of the researchers said: “Such a tax is not going to solve obesity by itself, but we have shown it could be an effective public health measure and should be considered alongside other measures to tackle obesity in the UK.”

However others argue that the tax would hit the young and poor disproportionately at a time when bills are already rising, and that demonising one product among many, many sugary delicious treats would hardly be enough to stem bulging waistlines.

Where do you stand? Should we tax for the nation’s health? Or stand aside for its pleasure?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in