Lap dances aren't art, folks

 

Wednesday 24 October 2012 09:24 BST
Comments
Agyness Deyn in Pusher
Agyness Deyn in Pusher

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kelly Brook once said "striptease is an art", but a New York court has ruled otherwise, stating this week that lap dances do not promote culture in the way that ballet or other arts do, so cannot be exempt from tax.

The case for tax breaks was filed by Nite Moves club in suburban Albany, who argued that fees for admission to the club and private dances should be exempt from sales tax.

New York's highest court reviewed the case without reaching consensus: three of seven judges dissented, saying there was no provision in the law that separated "highbrow and lowbrow dance".

One, Judge Robert Smith, noted that regulations allow reduced tax on admissions charges for "a live dramatic, choreographic or musical performance". Though Smith said he disproved of stripping itself as "unedifying" and "distasteful", the women at Nite Moves club are clearly engaged in "choreographic performance", he wrote.

Smith also furnished the court with a useful analogy: "I do not read Hustler magazine; I would rather read the New Yorker. I would be appalled, however, if the state were to exact from Hustler a tax that the New Yorker did not have to pay, on the ground that what appears in Hustler is insufficiently 'cultural and artistic.'"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in