Google delivers elegant response to criticism of its poppy

 

Monday 11 November 2013 16:31 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The response by a Google spokesman to criticism of its Remembrance Day poppy should go down in the Spokesperson's Bible of Tactful Putdowns and Restrained Dismissiveness.

Earlier today Labour MP Gerry Sutcliffe said that the small poppy displayed below Google's search bar was an insufficiently "spectacular" tribute to Britain's war dead: "Around Remembrance Day it is demeaning not to have something that is spectacular".

Another MP, Tory Julian Brazier, praised Bing, a rival search engine to Google, for its own, larger remembrance day tribute, saying: "Well done Bing for making such a clear and unmistakeable gesture".

Twitter quickly split into critics and supporters of the Google poppy; that it is an issue at all surely demonstrates that sensitivity about the wearing and placement of the poppy has reached new heights.

The Google spokesman stepped into this fraught area with a polite, calm and marginally patronising riposte, worth repeating:

"We try to be sensitive that a doodle is sometimes not the most appropriate way to recognise certain events, especially those that are more somber in nature."

The spokesman went on to point out that graphics - like the one displayed on the homepage - are their way of covering "events that are important and meaningful for our users" that "a doodle may not necessarily be a good fit for."

Shouldn't that be that?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in