EDL stirs up hatred and makes risk of attack ‘more likely’, says poll

 

Sunday 26 May 2013 16:09 BST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Some interesting results were thrown up by a Survation poll published today:

The poll asked 1,121 adults a number of questions relating to the Woolwich attack:

* 61 per cent of those surveyed thought that the actions of the EDL made the risk of terrorist attacks "more likely"

* 47.6 per cent said that the "Snooper's Charter" should not be reintroduced as it is a threat to civil liberties. 40.1 per cent thought it should be brought back.

* 59.3 per cent believed figures like Anjem Choudary, former leader of the banned Al-Muhajiroun group, should not be allowed to appear on TV programmes.

* 51.5 per cent of respondents thought that broadcasters were right to show graphic footage of the attack, as it was in the public interest.

The migration think tank British Future interpreted the Survation poll, as well as two other YouGov polls published this weekend, as showing that "this week's spike in online support for the EDL is coming from a tiny (and indeed dwindling) minority fringe, and is certainly not an expression of the public's view in general".

You can read their full report here.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in