Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Traditional polling methods aren't all they're cracked up to be, writes Seth Stephens-Davidovitz in the New York Times. Why? Because people are reluctant to admit that they won't vote.
But Stephens-Davidovitz has a solution: "My research suggests that by comparing Google search rates for voting information so far this year with search rates on comparable dates from previous elections, we might already be able to get a pretty good idea of the composition of the 2012 electorate."
Thanks to Google, that non-judgemental receptacle for all our most unacceptable secrets, we know that people search "Paul Ryan shirtless 9 times more often than "Paul Ryan budget" and that "on election day in 2008, roughly 1 in 100 searches that included 'Obama' also included 'KKK' or 'nigger'."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments