The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Climate change denial is a right-wing conspiracy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Drought and temperatures hot enough to stop corn having sex have not convinced Americans of human-caused climate change, as a new study shows that the US population are more skeptical of man's impact on global warming than they were ten years ago, despite scientific consensus on the matter.
The Daily Beast gives a nod to Upton Sinclair in explanation: "It is difficult to get a man to understand a thing when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”
One in two conservative Republicans see nothing to sweat about and don't believe in the planet getting warmer at all.
This is deeply troubling, says Jay Michaelson. "All reputable climatologists agree that human-caused (“anthrogenic”) climate change is real. Our popular confusion is the result not of an honest difference of opinion, but, to quote our Secretary of State, of a vast right-wing conspiracy."
Conservatives like the Koch brothers have long funded think tanks to create the impression that there is no scientific consensus on the topic, and "blitzed the airwaves and bookshelves with pseudo-scientific fact-muddling written by non specialists."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments