Don't tell me social media doesn't damage your health while people pay $15,000 to have their Instagram accounts verified

It looks like a twisted, digital adaptation of a sort of obscure cash-for-honours affair, but with so much more at stake: a whole generation’s sanity

Josie Cox
Thursday 14 September 2017 09:30 BST
Comments
22-year-old British-born Laura Crane is a a professional surfer, model and emerging Instagram sensation
22-year-old British-born Laura Crane is a a professional surfer, model and emerging Instagram sensation (Instagram)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

So obsessed have we become with digital recognition and the accompanying prestige that people are reportedly paying up to $15,000 on a strange kind of black market to have their Instagram accounts verified.

For the uninitiated, that means that people are shelling out more than a third of the average UK annual salary for the honour of having the social media platform place a small tick next to their names on their profiles, denoting them as people of particular public interest.

The sought-after swoosh - already a familiar feature on Twitter and Facebook - apparently grants users a prime spot in search results and gives them access to some special features on the photo-sharing site. But most importantly to many, it serves as a supreme status symbol – a magnet for followers, which in turn have quickly emerged as the common currency of popularity.

To me, the whole practice looks like a twisted, digital adaptation of a sort of obscure cash-for-honours affair, but arguably with so much more at stake: a whole generation’s sanity.

The news is symptomatic of how far our preoccupation with online influencers and overnight celebrities has become. That preoccupation threatens to teach our children that anything you do in life is basically irrelevant, unless it happens on the web. And it elevates the importance of our cyber-existence above the lives we lead offline.

I’m useless at keeping up to date with TV or film. I discovered the joys of Netflix embarrassingly recently, so it was only a few weeks ago that I watched an episode from the third season of the dystopian sci-fi series Black Mirror. “Nosedive” tells the tale of Lacie, a young woman who becomes so fixated on how highly her friends and acquaintances rate her on social media that she completely loses the plot, drunkenly crashes her best friend’s wedding and ends up in jail hurling obscenities at a fellow inmate before the credits start to roll.

The story is in equal parts entertaining and terrifying, precisely because it doesn’t actually veer as far from reality as it’s perhaps designed to do. Already social media has transformed a generation of young people into image-obsessed perfectionists, many of whom are enslaved by self-criticism and a belief that they are only worth as much as their likes, comments and retweets.

Round-the-clock exposure to pictures and posts of beautiful, successful, wealthy and worldly people is supercharging our insecurities more than we might realise. Several studies claim to have proven the positive effects the internet has on our long-term mental health (as a result of it being a tool to create and foster relationships) but numerous others have demonstrated the opposite.

Time spent surfing the web has been associated with an increase in depressive symptoms. A study by the University of Missouri-Columbia has demonstrated that using Facebook can lead to depression if feelings of envy are triggered.

The sprawling nature of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and their ilk means that any attempt to police the social media universe would amount to nothing more than a waste of energy and money. But that’s no excuse to let this problem swell and linger.

Here in the UK, the Advertising Standards Authority already does a decent job of cracking down on public campaigns that offend, upset, mislead or disturb. Extending their influence to personal accounts would be unreasonable, not to mention impossible (imagine banning a photograph for making someone look too toned or too tanned – or censoring a snapshot of a Caribbean beach because it might distress someone sitting in an office in rainy Slough).

But what we can do is educate.

We need classes on the national curriculum to teach people what virtual reality is, and to make people familiar with the deceptions and shams that it facilitates – both trivial and vital.

In the age of the internet’s utter dominance, it’s never been more important to equip particularly vulnerable youngsters with the skills needed to recognise the dangers of social media. Cyber-bullying and identity fraud are widespread, but the list of other hazards is lengthy and bleak. You wouldn’t throw your child in the ocean without teaching it to swim. So why would you consider doing so if you weren’t even able to see all the sharks?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in