Don’t knock the judges who ruled on genocide and Israel – applaud them
They reached no view on whether there has been genocide in Gaza – nor did they call for a permanent ceasefire – but they have treated the case with the seriousness it deserves, writes Sir Malcolm Rifkind
Today’s ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is rather like the curate’s egg. It is good in parts. And not only South Africa and the Palestinians – but also the Israelis – will take considerable comfort from it.
Israel’s critics will be pleased that the ICJ has accepted jurisdiction to give further consideration to the claim that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza. But nothing that the judges have said implies that there is even a presumption that genocide has been established.
As it is being assumed that it may be years, rather than months, before any judgment is reached, that will be of little comfort to Hamas and its friends.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies