Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When the Coalition Government decided to place more power in the hands of the electorate and subject individual police forces to the scrutiny of an independent, democratically elected supervisor, the point was that the post should, indeed, be independent. That is to say that the police and crime commissioner should be very difficult, if not impossible, to remove.
That is a necessary condition of independence for such a public official – to be free from being threatened by other vested interests – and a principle worth defending, even in perverse circumstances, as in the case of Shaun Wright in South Yorkshire. The entire political establishment, including the Prime Minister, the Home Secretary, the Labour leader Ed Miliband, Rotherham council, the Police and Crime Panel that oversees him and even his own deputy, have publicly called on him to quit, in the light of the report into the Rotherham abuse scandal. Mr Wright may, as he claims, have had many messages of support, but the public as a whole is appalled at his record. He has now been reported to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which may further undermine Mr Wright’s authority, were that possible.
Mr Wright, as a discredited figure, will be a lame duck commissioner, meaning that local people will – in effect – be deprived of the democratic oversight that the role of police and crime commissioner was designed to deliver. Regrettable as that situation may be, it is still better than retrospective legislation aimed at his removal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments