Why is the ‘plebgate’ inquiry taking so long?

Despite the teams of police officers, the pots of public money and the multiple arrests over the last year – we are no nearer to the truth

Editorial
Tuesday 17 September 2013 18:18 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It will be exactly one year ago on Thursday that the Chief Whip had his fateful spat with the police as he went to ride his bicycle through the pedestrian-only Downing Street gates. A month later Andrew Mitchell resigned amid claims that, worse even than shouting at the officers in question, he had also called them “plebs”. For a Tory cabinet minister, in particular, the allegation was political dynamite.

Except that Mr Mitchell, while admitting he had been disrespectful and foul-mouthed, consistently denied his use of the P-word. And CCTV footage, finally released many weeks later, recorded not only a surprisingly brief interaction given the lengthy dialogue recorded by police , but also no sign of the tourists reported as “visibly shocked” in the official log. Finally, more concerning still, the corroborative email to the Deputy Chief Whip purporting to come from a civilian witness was revealed to be a fabrication by a police officer who was not there.

All of which fully warranted the inquiry, Operation Alice, that was swiftly launched. And yet a year on from the original incident – despite the teams of police officers, the pots of public money and the multiple arrests – we are no nearer the truth.

This is not only a matter of justice for a single person. The suggestion that serving police officers lied, falsified official records and conspired to smear a cabinet minister – forcing his resignation, as it turned out – has implications far beyond the specifics of the individual case, egregious as they are.

Yet the more time that passes, the more suspicions of obfuscation are aroused. That the police have so poor a record at investigating themselves only adds to the concern. If there are reasons for the delay, it is time we were told them.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in