Westminster farce
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yesterday was not a good one for the House of Commons. In an echo of the old saying about the cobbler's children being the worst shod, MPs - who are, after all, supposed to be expert in the theory and practice of elections - failed in the most miserable fashion to come up with a rational system for electing their own Speaker.
Yesterday was not a good one for the House of Commons. In an echo of the old saying about the cobbler's children being the worst shod, MPs - who are, after all, supposed to be expert in the theory and practice of elections - failed in the most miserable fashion to come up with a rational system for electing their own Speaker.
To be fair, a good deal of the blame for that has to lie with Sir Edward Heath, the Father of the House, who chaired the proceedings. Despite objections from all sides, from the veteran Tam Dalyell to the new boy Andrew Tyrie, he refused to act on Tony Benn's sensible motion to organise a ballot to choose the top two candidates, who would go on to argue their respective cases in the chamber.
But what was even more remarkable was the way that MPs actually gave in to the curmudgeon. Time and again there were calls for the standing orders of the House to be suspended and for the Benn motion to be put, but Sir Edward simply ignored them. If MPs cannot even stand up to the Father of the House - and their views should have been gathered and put to him long before yesterday's shenanigans - then what hope can we have that they will ever stand up to the Government?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments