Wedding march

Wednesday 23 January 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Where should we get married? The answer, surely, should be: wherever we would like to be married. It has not so far been the case that we could get married where we wish, but the Government is proposing to shake all that up. After a two-year consultation (after all, you shouldn't rush into these things), it will no longer be the venue that is licensed for marriage, but the person conducting the ceremony.

Where should we get married? The answer, surely, should be: wherever we would like to be married. It has not so far been the case that we could get married where we wish, but the Government is proposing to shake all that up. After a two-year consultation (after all, you shouldn't rush into these things), it will no longer be the venue that is licensed for marriage, but the person conducting the ceremony.

This news will serve as a welcome wedding present for all those who want to explore some of the more imaginative locations to get spliced. The London Eye, it seems a safe bet, will be a popular place to pledge yourself to your beloved for richer or poorer. In the near future, just impediment may well be asked at services taking place under water, or with the participants suspended by parachutes, although the stipulation that the place of marriage be "safe" may stop things becoming too adventurous.

We must draw the line somewhere, though. We would hope that the law would not be liberalised to the extent that a British couple could claim "our best man was a dolphin", as was recently the case in California. Still, the speech would be short.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in