The red card to bad language on the pitch

Monday 07 March 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Martin Ward, the deputy leader of the Secondary Heads Association, is so upset about the bad behaviour of professional footballers that he thinks matches should be shown on TV only after 9pm because of the bad example the players set to children. It is an interesting reaction to foul-mouthed behaviour on the pitch, and a little eccentric, not to say extreme. Censoring football matches is a somewhat impractical approach to the problem and is, in any case, unlikely to have much impact on the players concerned. Football, it is safe to assume, will continue to be tea-time viewing in many British homes.

Martin Ward, the deputy leader of the Secondary Heads Association, is so upset about the bad behaviour of professional footballers that he thinks matches should be shown on TV only after 9pm because of the bad example the players set to children. It is an interesting reaction to foul-mouthed behaviour on the pitch, and a little eccentric, not to say extreme. Censoring football matches is a somewhat impractical approach to the problem and is, in any case, unlikely to have much impact on the players concerned. Football, it is safe to assume, will continue to be tea-time viewing in many British homes.

However, Mr Ward has a point. It is true that the way footballers abuse each other and match officials can be pretty uncivilised. Fans are rarely better mannered, and, in the worst cases, descend into racist chanting and abuse of black players (as, sadly, do some managers who ought to know better). The worst of the violence, on and off the pitch, may be behind us, but verbal aggression is unfortunately very much part of the game. It is not necessary, even for the huge stakes that are so much part of the modern game.

It would be naive to try to turn football matches into nativity plays, but it should be possible to try to expunge the worst excesses of misbehaviour by players. Given the technology that is now available to officials to monitor play, it should be possible to use that same approach to discipline players if they fall below agreed standards of conduct. Such transgressions could be punished by a system of fines and, in the worst cases, by imposing match bans. Referees could pay more attention to this aspect when considering whether to caution players or send them off. Perhaps some players might usefully be offered the option of anger management courses. It might even help them play better.

The extent to which impressionable children look to football stars to set an example is impossible to measure but obviously real. Their posters adorn bedroom walls and their autographs are treated like holy relics. If our footballers were just a touch more civilised on the pitch, our school classrooms might be a little less unruly too.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in