The price of nature: Giving the natural world a value could help to protect it

There is much to be gained from calculating the value of clean air, say, or virgin forests

Editorial
Thursday 21 November 2013 20:23 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The first ever meeting of the World Forum on Natural Capital now taking place in Edinburgh has provoked much ire among some environmentalists. Because the natural world is heart-stoppingly beautiful – the contention goes – and because it is both our physical home and a source of emotional succour, any talk of economic value is not only grossly inappropriate but outright damaging. To make the point, protesters dressed as auctioneers congregated outside the conference centre yesterday offering Ben Nevis, Loch Ness and similar to the highest bidder.

A neat stunt. The only snag is that the argument is wrong. It is not that the natural world is not a glory beyond price; it is, of course. But there is, nonetheless, much to be gained from calculating the value of clean air, say, or virgin forests, and also the loss from their destruction. To clinch the case one need look no further than the intractable problem of climate change, highlighted once again this week by the wranglings at the UN summit in Warsaw. With a proper price on carbon, not only would emissions be fewer but there also might be more funding available for dealing with the damage already caused. For as long as nature is ascribed no value, it will continue to be treated as valueless.

The Edinburgh forum is, then, a real step along the road towards a proper appreciation of the natural world. For too long, such concerns have been a matter of morality alone; as long as they remain so, “green crap” (as the Prime Minister may – or may not – have described the environmental levies on energy bills) will remain discretionary. Steadily growing pressure over the past few decades may have improved both public awareness and business practice. But it is not until environmental considerations are built into company strategies, into national accounting and – hardly less crucially – into the prices that consumers pay that we will see real progress.

But there is a broader point here, too. To divide the world into caring environmentalists and rapacious business people was never constructive. Nor is it a betrayal to approach the natural world in economic terms. Rather, it is the green movement joining the mainstream – which is just where it should be.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in