The forgotten inmates

Sunday 09 June 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government must stick to its promise and fund more suitable accommodation for the forgotten patients of Broadmoor.

It usually takes a terrible crime for us to remember that Broadmoor and Britain's two other special hospitals, Rampton and Ashworth, exist. They are mentioned only when the most disturbed of killers are sent to them after conviction. They house people such as Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper, and Ian Brady, the Moors Murderer. But, as we report today, inside their walls, around 400 patients are trapped, forgotten.

They are kept there needlessly because of a failure to develop accommodation for people who do not need such high-security care. Some of them have been waiting for five years or more for a transfer to more suitable accommodation. Their incarceration is maintained at enormous cost: to themselves, to their families, and to the public purse. Keeping someone inside Broadmoor takes £100,000 a year. A heavy price is paid elsewhere, too. Other disturbed people, convicted of major crimes, are kept in prison when what is really required is psychiatric treatment. Mental health services are gridlocked.

It is three years since Sir Richard Tilt, the former prison service director-general, identified that hundreds of patients are ready for transfer, or even discharge, after treatment from the special hospitals. A year later, the Government announced that up to £25m should be spent on additional long-term psychiatric beds to provide for patients needlessly kept in these hospitals.

Yet little appears to have changed. That is not surprising. It takes long enough in this country for action to be taken to improve services for people suffering from, say, heart disease or breast cancer. They are the deserving sick. For far too many of us, the mentally ill are the undeserving. Few people, apart from their beleaguered relatives, feel any compunction to do something about their plight.

But to keep people locked away not getting the treatment they need is hardly the action of a civilised society. The Government must stick to its promise and fund more suitable accommodation for the forgotten patients of Broadmoor. Such a move will have beneficial repurcussions elsewhere, ending logjams in prisons. But, more importantly, the Government will have discharged its duty, a duty it bears to the most vulnerable and the least visible in society.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in