The firefighters' leaders have made a terrible mistake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The firefighters' leaders laid about themselves last night, accusing unnamed people of "trying to engineer" an eight-day strike. This is part of a pattern of trying to avoid their own responsibility for their disastrous handling of this dispute.
John McGhee, one of the union's national officers, gave the game away. "All we have been offered so far is an increase of 4 per cent, not a penny more, with any more money having to come through modernisation." In other words, the firefighters have been offered more than the 4 per cent in the first year, but the extra is conditional on changes in working practices.
The weakness of the union's position is laid bare. This is not a dispute about money, it is about the refusal of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) to accept reform. That has been the nub issue all along. Most of the point-scoring since last week's two-day strike is irrelevant. It does not matter how much George Bain, the chairman of the review of firefighters' pay and conditions, earns as vice-chancellor of Queen's University, Belfast. Nor does it matter who is responsible for the poor representation of women and ethnic minorities in the fire service, the FBU or the employers, both of whom are formally committed to equal opportunities.
The question now is whether or not the FBU will accept more flexible shift patterns in return for higher pay. Its initial demand for a 40 per cent rise to a basic salary of £30,000 was clearly unacceptable – and Andy Gilchrist, the FBU leader, has made it clear the union will take less. But on changing work practices, the union is immovable. That cannot be a principle for which it is worth risking a single life.
If the employers really were offering 16 per cent over two-and-a-half years, without significant changes in the way that the fire brigades work, that would be too much.
Firefighters are brave people who risk their lives to protect us. They deserve a decent wage. But they are already well paid, with a shift system that allows them to take second jobs. The public are prepared to pay firefighters more, but only FBU members believe that it is impossible to organise the fire service more efficiently. The Government must hold firm.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments