The Birmingham pub bombing victims' families deserve answers

The successful enquiry into the Hillsborough disaster has offered a positive example of what can be achieved by a fresh look at the evidence 

Wednesday 01 June 2016 16:20 BST
Comments
The decision to re-open the inquests into the Birmingham pub bombings has been welcomed
The decision to re-open the inquests into the Birmingham pub bombings has been welcomed (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The reopening of the inquests into the deaths of 21 people killed in the 1974 IRA Birmingham pub bombings will be well-received by surviving friends and family of the deceased. The decision by Louise Hunt, senior coroner for Birmingham and Solihull, should also be welcomed by anybody with an interest in gaining a true understanding of one of the Troubles’ deadliest acts of terrorism, and the resulting miscarriage of justice that led to six men being wrongly imprisoned for the crime.

Re-examining past tragedies is a difficult business, of course. But the successful inquiry into the Hillsborough football stadium disaster has offered a positive example of what can be achieved by a fresh look at the evidence. Police forces may feel aggrieved at having their actions raked over years after the event, but there can be no time limit to the pursuit of truth and accountability.

Indeed, in reaching her decision, Ms Hunt concluded that the police may have missed two tip-offs that bombings were imminent – one on the day of the attack and another more than a week earlier. Her suggestion that by missing the advance warnings the police may thus have “failed to take the necessary steps to protect life” is potentially provocative, and it is perhaps no surprise that West Midlands Police sought to argue that she did not have jurisdiction to hear the inquests.

Relatives of those who were killed have maintained for years that state agencies ought to have prevented the attacks. There is certainly no doubt that Birmingham was in a state of heightened tension at the time, following the death of Provisional IRA man James McDade in a botched bombing a week earlier. A ban on any paramilitary-style funeral for McDade, and the subsequent repatriation of his body to the Republic of Ireland, had put IRA elements in Birmingham on edge.

In principle, the reopened inquests offer a new opportunity to unravel what happened on and around the 21 November 1974. It is to be hoped that relevant agencies and individuals will co-operate in full, so that bereaved families might finally get the answers they crave.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in