Spelt out
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Should we really care that our children cannot spell Shakespeare's name correctly? After all, neither could the great playwright himself. He used three different variants – Shakspere, Shakspeare, and Shakespeare. And as for not being able to spell Jane Austen, that novelist spelt stopped as stopt, scissors as scissars, and sofa as sopha. In fact, it wasn't until Austen's near contemporary, Samuel Johnson, published his Dictionary in 1775 that standardised spelling became a possibility, let alone a way of torturing school children, judging scrabble entries and filling in crosswords. Yes, we too can see the practical advantages of removing ambiguities, but would that be sufficient reason to give-in to that modern instrument of standardisation – the Microsoft Spell Checker – with its insistence that defence is spelt defense and humour as humor? No, let a thousand variants bloom, in spelling as in all other forms of life.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments