Scotland the brave: An early, decisive victory for the SNP on fox hunting

 

Editorial
Tuesday 14 July 2015 21:01 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

“The unspeakable in full pursuit of the uneatable” is how Oscar Wilde famously styled the sight of an English country gentleman on a fox hunt. Something of the same could be said of the sight of David Cameron, no stranger to a red coat, in full pursuit of the Hunting Act. And yet, having flushed out his quarry and in charge of a newly enlarged pack of slavering (mostly) pro-hunting Tory MPs, his prey is proving unexpectedly elusive.

For the Hunting Act 2004 will almost certainly survive now that the Scottish National Party has come out in its support. Rightly or wrongly, that is a matter of plain parliamentary arithmetic. To a large degree, though, Mr Cameron brought this particular defeat on himself. Had he not tried to enact a major legislative change by stealth through changing statutory instruments, the SNP’s case for intervention would be much weaker. Mr Cameron assumed too much about their behaviour, thinking they’d stick to their usual practice of ignoring English-only issues. Which is not to say that the SNP case was particularly strong. Indeed, some of their arguments are comically bogus, such as the idea that they had to defeat the Government to show Mr Cameron just how precarious his parliamentary majority is. The Prime Minister is not so stupid that he needs to be told.

As a guerrilla act of resistance to the idea of English votes for English laws (Evel), the SNP’s ploy worked. Still, the SNP’s almost rabid opposition to the “double majority” proposal for English-only legislation is hard to understand. Evel is simply the best answer yet found to the famous old West Lothian question. If those on the SNP benches in the Commons and at Holyrood can come up with a better idea, we’d love to hear it. The SNP’s vulpine cunning could also be put to good use on that project.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in