It is a moment any politician rightly dreads, where the microphone is still on and an intemperate, revealing or downright foolish remark makes its way into the public domain. Gillian Keegan, the education secretary, has suffered just such a “hot mic” moment, asking her ITV News interviewer, with heavy sarcasm, whether anyone had praised the work “we” have been doing on the school buildings scandal, while others were resting on their laurels. Or rather coarser formulations to that effect.
True to The Thick of It-style narrative the hapless secretary of state was quickly slapped down by No 10 (who had little choice but to do so) and the TV cameras were invited into the department for her to perform a suitably contrite mea culpa. Unfortunately, Ms Keegan proceeded only to apologise for how she said what she said – “choice language” – rather than what she said and the sentiments and messaging she conveyed. In essence, she does indeed stand by the entitled tone of her “off the cuff” remarks. She pleads that it’s not all her fault; maybe so, given her recent arrival in post, but enough of the scandal is her responsibility and that of her government for her to take some personal and collective responsibility. Instead, Ms Keegan sounded as if she was looking for congratulations for her hard work and that of her department. That’s because that indeed is what she and the government think is their due. Her tone, the swearing, but also the substance of her remarks is what parents and others find so offensive, and which makes her look out of touch.
As for the others who apparently did “nothing”, they remain unidentified. Could these unspecified lazy, complacent individuals be found in the Treasury in recent years, refusing properly to fund urgent school repairs? According to the former permanent secretary at the department, Jonathan Slater, they include Rishi Sunak, who cut the programme for school renovations in 2021.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies