Pipe dream

Wednesday 15 August 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

How many holes does it take to fill the streets of London?

How many holes does it take to fill the streets of London? Answer: 500,000 each year. That's how many times the streets of the capital city are dug up by utility companies laying new phone, electricity and pipe lines and repairing old ones. It is not an unfamiliar sight anywhere in Britain to see a road dug up by one company, repaired – and then promptly dug up by another. Other than being a more effective device to slow down traffic than even a brightly painted speed camera, the upheaval caused by these subterranean roadworks is a nuisance estimated to cost £2bn a year in delays, accidents and road damage.

Now a solution is at hand: local councils are to be permitted (on a trial basis) to charge companies a "lane rental" fee of £500 per day for digging up roads and pavements. The thinking is that this inducement to finish up quickly will both reduce the total time for each job and provide revenue for other local transport schemes. But the problem with wheezes like this is that they tend to create "perverse" incentives. This one might turn out to be just an excuse to get the regulator to raise the bills, justified by taking more time than ever to finish the job. One thing is sure, however, the customer will pay in the end.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in