Not the end of Old King Coal

As the gas price spirals upwards and that of coal tumbles, a reprieve for Britain’s remaining coal power stations appears in sight

Editorial
Monday 22 July 2013 00:40 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It has been decades since coal was paramount in the energy sector in Britain. In most people’s minds, obviously excluding miners, its decline is a blessing. Coal may have made Britain rich but when it was king, our towns and cities were coated in thick black soot and the effect of all those emissions on people’s health was devastating.

With a government committed to meeting Britain’s obligations to continue cutting CO2 emissions, and only 18 coal power stations left, it seemed as if these relics of the past were soon to go the same way as the steam engine.

But the vagaries of international pricing have since intervened, and, as the gas price spirals upwards and that of coal tumbles, a reprieve for Britain’s remaining coal power stations appears in sight. As we report today, instead of shutting them down, as green environmentalists until recently expected, a loophole in the Government’s Energy Bill may allow them to upgrade their facilities so that they can remain open into the next decade.

The reason for the change of heart is simple. As the demand for energy grows, there are fears that we could soon face restrictions on its use, or even 1970s-style blackouts. The energy regulator, Ofgem, has warned in a recent report of “tightening electricity margins”. As a result, the feeling in Whitehall is that we should keep every energy option open.

Environmentalists, who had hoped that King Coal had long since heard the last rites, are naturally appalled. Greenpeace, for one, maintains that Britain cannot meet its carbon targets if coal power stations remain open.

Their objections should certainly be taken into consideration. But we need to be realistic about what is being mooted, which is not the mass opening of new coal power stations, but the possible retention of most of the old ones for longer than we anticipated. We all want cleaner, greener, energy as the long-term goal. But for now, it may be that secure energy is going to have to trump emission targets.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in