Long hours, sick days, and the British workplace

Monday 24 May 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

We are a nation of skivers, according to a survey of 500 firms conducted by the Confederation of British Industry. An estimated 25 million working days were lost last year to those mysterious day-long illnesses known as "sickies".

We are a nation of skivers, according to a survey of 500 firms conducted by the Confederation of British Industry. An estimated 25 million working days were lost last year to those mysterious day-long illnesses known as "sickies". It cost £11.6bn to cover the salaries of absent staff. Many of these lost days fell on a Friday or Monday, letting the invalid take a long weekend away from work. The implication of the survey is that we Britons need to buck up and stop ripping off our employers.

But excuse us if we demur from the mindset that says we should devote all our waking moments to the workplace. We already work more hours in Britain than most other countries - our European neighbours would not put up with it. The French value their leisure and family time so much that they have introduced a statutory 35-hour week. The best we have on this side of the Channel is legislation that entitles us to "ask" for flexible hours. Employers should consider whether rising rates of absenteeism are a symptom of our ruthless culture of long hours, rather than a manifestation of our innate laziness.

And what does the figure of £11.6bn really mean? Calculating the salary an employee is paid on a day off and chalking it up as a "loss" is cloud-cuckoo-land economics. By this logic, if we all worked weekends and bank holidays the British economy would be the largest in the world. In reality, workers need free time in order to do their jobs effectively. What the Government's experiment with flexible working legislation has taught us is that, over time, employers recognise the benefits of flexibility. With a little encouragement, businesses can learn that their employees can work fewer hours and be just as, if not more, productive.

We need to examine the way we are living now. Our free time is being diminished, and what we do have is fraught as mobile phones and the internet mean we're never totally out of contact. We have less time to spend with our families, with all the malign implications this has for bringing up children. This, not the "sickie", is the real scandal of the British workplace.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in